Summary
denying motion for conditional certification where the plaintiff "provided no direct evidence . . . that other employees were similarly situated to her with respect to [defendant's] policies and practices, [and where there was also no] evidence of opt-ins despite 10 months of discovery"
Summary of this case from Jordan v. Meridian BankOpinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1190
10-24-2012
DAAIYAH GOLDSTEIN v. THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff Daaiyah Goldstein's Motion for Conditional Certification and for an Order Authorizing Notice to Similarly Situated Persons Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 219(b) (Doc. 54), the Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification of her Pre-Shift, Post-Shift, and Meal Break Timekeeping Claims filed by Defendant Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Doc. 58), and Plaintiff's Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification (Doc. 59), and for the reasons set out in the Court's Memorandum Opinion of this date, , it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 54) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
______________
DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE