Argued January 19, 1922
Decided February 3, 1922
Joseph L. Prager and Arnold Furst for appellant.
Joseph Levy for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ. Dissenting: HOGAN and ANDREWS, JJ.
Full title:CHARLES GOLDMAN, Doing Business as CHARLES GOLDMAN CO., Appellant, v …
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 3, 1922
Defendant's argument that a dog is an animate object rather than an inanimate object and, thus, not within…
Breslerman v. Newark Ins. Co.The policy of insurance was prepared by the defendant and therefore must be construed most favorably to the…