From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. Filippatos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 2008
52 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 3993, 3993A.

June 24, 2008.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 25, 2007, which denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, referring the matter of damages and costs to a Special Referee to hear and report, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Parisis G. Filippatos, New York, appellant pro se.

Martin Wm. Goldman, New York, for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Tom, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.


The Fee Dispute Resolution Program has no applicability where the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000 ( see 22 NYCRR 137.1 [b] [2]); both parties agree that the amount in dispute substantially exceeds that amount. Plaintiff contends that since it rescinded the tentative credit of $50,000, the amount owed by defendant client is approximately $140,000. Defendant admits he paid only $114,000 of the approximately $250,000 billed in attorney's fees. The amount in dispute clearly exceeds the $50,000 cap.

Plaintiff law firm did not consent to arbitration ( 22 NYCRR 137.2). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether defendant waived his right to arbitration.


Summaries of

Goldman v. Filippatos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 24, 2008
52 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Goldman v. Filippatos

Case Details

Full title:GOLDMAN GREENBAUM, P.C., Respondent, v. PARISIS G. FILIPPATOS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 24, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5749
861 N.Y.S.2d 312