From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden v. Estate of Tanzler

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 10, 2018
257 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D16-4960

12-10-2018

Samuel C. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., Appellee.

Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant. Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.


Samuel C. Golden, pro se, Appellant.

Hans G. Tanzler, III, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., pro se, Appellee.

Per Curiam.In Burdoo v. Plympton , this court held that "[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[ ] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically." 219 So.3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; accord Havenner v. Hutchinson , 162 So.3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.

REVERSED .

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Golden v. Estate of Tanzler

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 10, 2018
257 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Golden v. Estate of Tanzler

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL C. GOLDEN, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF HANS G. TANZLER, JR., Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 10, 2018

Citations

257 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Golden v. Estate of Tanzler

isoner litigation, affirmed); 1D01-2418 (prisoner litigation, denied); 1D01-3153 (prisoner litigation,…