From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden State Foods Corp. v. Mendoza

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 3, 2014
CV 14-7045-MWF (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2014)

Opinion

          Rita Sanchez/Cheryl Wynn ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: Rodney G. Moore

          Rosalyn Adams ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: Justin Silverman


          PRESENT: HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

          PROCEEDINGS: DEFENDANTS' PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [1]; RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONERS' PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION [10]; RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER'S PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BASED ON FRCP RULE 12B-1 AND 12B-6 AND REQUEST FOR SANCTION OF $7, 537.44. [11]

          HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         The Courtroom Deputy Clerk distributes the Court's tentative ruling prior to the case being called.

         Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court hears oral argument from counsel and takes the matter under submission. An order will issue.


Summaries of

Golden State Foods Corp. v. Mendoza

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Nov 3, 2014
CV 14-7045-MWF (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Golden State Foods Corp. v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:Golden State Foods Corp. v. Sidney Mendoza

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

CV 14-7045-MWF (Ex) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Azod v. Robinson

As the Court previously concluded, respondents' Rule 41(a)(1) notice was improper. See Golden State Foods.…