From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden State Bank v. Dolph

Supreme Court of California
Apr 6, 1927
201 Cal. 767 (Cal. 1927)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 8516.

April 6, 1927.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. R.Y. Williams, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Black, Hammack Black and Meserve Meserve for Appellant.

Underwood, Burke Cree for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


THE COURT.

[1] This is an appeal on the judgment-roll from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note. The facts are the same as those involved in The Anaheim National Bank v. Dolph, ante, p. 17 [ 255 P. 184], with the exception of the amount of the note. By stipulation this appeal was submitted for decision on the arguments and briefs in that case. On the authority of said case, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Golden State Bank v. Dolph

Supreme Court of California
Apr 6, 1927
201 Cal. 767 (Cal. 1927)
Case details for

Golden State Bank v. Dolph

Case Details

Full title:GOLDEN STATE BANK (a Corporation), Respondent, v. BLANCHE L. DOLPH…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 6, 1927

Citations

201 Cal. 767 (Cal. 1927)
255 P. 187

Citing Cases

Radcliff Auto. v. Morgan

Id. at 83. (Citing 3 C.J.S. Agency, § 255 p. 187). Collins v. Appalachian Research and Defense Fund of…

Philadelphia National Bank v. Buchman

suit provides for both legal costs and expenses of collection including an attorney's fee, the notes do not…