From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golden Eagle Capital Corp. v. Paramount Mgmt. Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2016
143 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

10-05-2016

GOLDEN EAGLE CAPITAL CORP., appellant, v. PARAMOUNT MANAGEMENT CORP., et al., defendants, Young Hoon Kang, et al., respondents.

Einig & Bush, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael R. Bush and Dan M. Rice of counsel), for appellant. Thomas G. Sherwood, LLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Rebecca J. Waldren of counsel), for respondents.


Einig & Bush, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael R. Bush and Dan M. Rice of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas G. Sherwood, LLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Rebecca J. Waldren of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lebowitz, J.), entered May 27, 2014, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Young Hoon Kang and Eun Ja Choi Kang which was pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them as abandoned.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the motion of the defendants Young Hoon Kang and Eun Ja Choi Kang which was pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them as abandoned is denied.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendants Young Hoon Kang and Eun Ja Choi Kang which was pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them as abandoned. Although the plaintiff failed to seek leave to enter a default judgment within one year after the default by those defendants, it demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the delay and the existence of a potentially meritorious cause of action (see CPLR 3215[c] ; Maspeth Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Brooklyn Heritage, LLC, 138 A.D.3d 793, 28 N.Y.S.3d 325 ; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Brown, 19 A.D.3d 638, 797 N.Y.S.2d 295 ; Greenpoint Bank v. Ginyard, 253 A.D.2d 451, 675 N.Y.S.2d 314 ; Umlic–One, Inc. v. Cahill Trust, 236 A.D.2d 390, 654 N.Y.S.2d 574 ; cf. Baldwin v. St. Clare's Hosp., 63 A.D.2d 761, 761, 404 N.Y.S.2d 730 ).

DILLON, J.P., COHEN, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Golden Eagle Capital Corp. v. Paramount Mgmt. Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2016
143 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Golden Eagle Capital Corp. v. Paramount Mgmt. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GOLDEN EAGLE CAPITAL CORP., appellant, v. PARAMOUNT MANAGEMENT CORP., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

143 A.D.3d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
143 A.D.3d 670
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6471

Citing Cases

JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Re

The reasonable excuse offered is not conclusory or unsubstantiated. The court finds that the plaintiff…

HSBC Bank v. Reynolds

Moreover, there is a lack of prejudice to defendant caused by the plaintiff's short delay (seeLNV Corp. v.…