From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gold v. Noori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1999
261 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 13, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.).


Plaintiff concedes that she did not purchase a second index number and did not effect service within 120 days as required by CPLR former 306-b N.Y.CPLR. Contrary to her contentions, the revised version of the statute may not be applied retroactively to this case and the court was without authority to extend the timeperiods provided in the former statute (see, Reid v. Presbyterian Hosp., 254 A.D.2d 139; Floyd v. Salamon Bros., 249 A.D.2d 139; see also, Connor v. Deas, 255 A.D.2d 287).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Gold v. Noori

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 13, 1999
261 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Gold v. Noori

Case Details

Full title:LISA D. GOLD, Appellant, v. MOHAMMED NOORI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 13, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
690 N.Y.S.2d 37

Citing Cases

Matonti v. Deluca

ory papers the acts that commence an action (see, Gershel v. Porr, 89 The law as it existed in 1993, required…

Keglic v. Flater

The complaint was filed on June 12, 1997, and was automatically dismissed on October 10, 1997, due to the…