From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GOFF v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 28, 1953
65 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1953)

Opinion

May 8, 1953. Rehearing Denied May 28, 1953.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County.

J.B. Patterson, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants.

Fleming, O'Bryan Fleming and T.O. Berryhill, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.


This was an action by Lee Annie Goff to recover damages for personal injuries, the complaint alleging that while she was a patient at Broward General Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, she was negligently and severely burned by agents of the Hospital in the application of a hot water bottle to her person. At the conclusion of plaintiff's case, defendant moved for directed verdict for failure to prove negligence and for failure to give 30 days notice of the injury as required by the City Charter. The court announced its intention to and did grant the motion. The plaintiff took a non-suit. This appeal was prosecuted.

It is not disputed that plaintiff was a pay patient at Broward General Hospital and that it was operated by the City of Fort Lauderdale. There is considerable controversy as to whether or not the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor applies to the facts presented. We think it at least aids the plaintiff's contention but it is our view that when the evidence as a whole is considered it presents issues that should have gone to the jury, so the trial court was in error when he instructed a verdict for defendant.

The trial court also held that the plaintiff was in error in not giving the City written notice of her claim within 30 days after receiving the injury as required by the City Charter.

Our view about this is that the plaintiff could sue in tort or on implied contract. She elected to pursue the latter and was not required to give the notice. In Doyle v. City of Coral Gables, 159 Fla. 802, 33 So.2d 41, we held that a passenger injured because of the negligent operation of a city bus may ground her action on tort or on implied contract to deliver her safely, and that if she elected to sue on implied contract, notice to the city before bringing the action was immaterial.

It is accordingly our view that the judgment appealed from must be and is hereby reversed for a new trial.

Reversed.

ROBERTS, C.J., and SEBRING and MATHEWS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GOFF v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
May 28, 1953
65 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1953)
Case details for

GOFF v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

Case Details

Full title:GOFF ET AL. v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: May 28, 1953

Citations

65 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1953)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Orange Mem. Hosp. Ass'n

Plaintiff was in a sick condition and did not have an equal opportunity to observe and examine the chair…

Tamiami Trail Tours v. Locke

. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co., 129 Fla. 518, 177 So. 294; Orr v. Avon Florida Citrus Corp., 130 Fla. 306,…