From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Godden v. Carmen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1991
169 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

January 28, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The issue of whether the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of having sustained a serious injury is one for the court in the first instance (Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 237). We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff has not satisfied the requirements of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and § 5104 (a) since her alleged injury, "acute cervical strain", did not significantly limit the use of a body function or system nor cause permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member. Accordingly, the court properly granted the respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Jones v Sharpe, 63 N.Y.2d 645; Martini v Asmann, 146 A.D.2d 571). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Godden v. Carmen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1991
169 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Godden v. Carmen

Case Details

Full title:NANCY GODDEN, Appellant, v. RAYMOND L. CARMEN, SR., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1991

Citations

169 A.D.2d 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
565 N.Y.S.2d 181

Citing Cases

Wallingford v. Perez

His report does say that the MRI revealed spurring and mucoid degeneration, but does not address defendants'…

Thompson v. Bronx Merch. Funding Servs., LLC

Atkins v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth., 222 A.D.2d 390, 634 N.Y.S.2d 522 (2nd Dept. 1995); Lanuto v.…