From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenside Steel Company v. United States

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Oct 17, 1974
503 F.2d 563 (C.C.P.A. 1974)

Opinion

Customs Appeal No. 74-18.

October 17, 1974.

David O. Elliott, New York City (Barnes, Richardson Colburn, New York City), attys. of record, for appellants. Irving Levine and Hadley S. King, New York City, of counsel.

Carla A. Hills, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, James Caffentzis and Robert Masters, New York City, for United States.

Appeal from United States Customs Court, Consolidated Reappraisement Appeals, R. 69/5355 and fourteen others.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges.


This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 71 Cust.Ct. 23, C.D. 4466, 364 F. Supp. 1398 (1973). The court held that plaintiffs (appellants here) had failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraisement of the salvaged steel, and that plaintiffs had failed to prove that their claimed values were correct.

After a thorough consideration of the record, of the briefs, and of the oral arguments, we have concluded that we are in full agreement with the opinion of the Customs Court, and we adopt it as our own. The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Glenside Steel Company v. United States

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Oct 17, 1974
503 F.2d 563 (C.C.P.A. 1974)
Case details for

Glenside Steel Company v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GLENSIDE STEEL COMPANY AND GERRY SCHMITT AND COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v. THE…

Court:United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1974

Citations

503 F.2d 563 (C.C.P.A. 1974)

Citing Cases

Allied Intern. v. U.S.

And defendant points up that, as a matter of law, Customs is presumed to have found the existence of every…