From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glens Falls Ins. v. U.S. for Use of Newton L

U.S.
Jan 22, 1968
390 U.S. 905 (1968)

Summary

noting the undesirability of determining the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision in a collective bargaining agreement on a bare stipulation of facts which supplies no indication of purpose or intention beyond the language of the provision and the general bargaining history

Summary of this case from Lone Star Steel v. United Mine W. of Am.

Opinion

No. 915.

January 22, 1968.


C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Martin J. Andrew for Glens Falls Insurance Co., and Roger T. Tammen for DMH Enterprises, Inc., petitioners. Louis Johnson for respondents. Reported below: 388 F. 2d 66.


Summaries of

Glens Falls Ins. v. U.S. for Use of Newton L

U.S.
Jan 22, 1968
390 U.S. 905 (1968)

noting the undesirability of determining the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision in a collective bargaining agreement on a bare stipulation of facts which supplies no indication of purpose or intention beyond the language of the provision and the general bargaining history

Summary of this case from Lone Star Steel v. United Mine W. of Am.
Case details for

Glens Falls Ins. v. U.S. for Use of Newton L

Case Details

Full title:GLENS FALLS INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF NEWTON…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 22, 1968

Citations

390 U.S. 905 (1968)

Citing Cases

United States v. Henry

At retrial, he was again convicted and received, in the language of the Supreme Court, a "longer total…

United States v. Coke

This instructs that no person shall "be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or…