From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glazer Gottlieb v. Nachman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1996
233 A.D.2d 275 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 26, 1996.

Order. Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered on or about June 25, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff law firm's motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for account stated and to dismiss defendant client's counterclaims for malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Ross, Tom and Andrias, JJ.


Defendant's counterclaim alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, raises questions of credibility that are not susceptibie to summary disposition ( Dershowitz Eiger v Helmsley, 219 AD2d 497), and that preclude summary judgment on the cause of action for account stated.


Summaries of

Glazer Gottlieb v. Nachman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1996
233 A.D.2d 275 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Glazer Gottlieb v. Nachman

Case Details

Full title:GLAZER GOTTLIEB, Appellant, v. PENELOPE S. NACHMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 275 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 544

Citing Cases

Kaye Scholer LLP v. Failsafe Air Saf. Sys. Corp.

Generally, the receipt and retention of an account, without objection, within a reasonable period of time,…

Widewaters Herkimer Co. v. Aiello

As the court noted in its decision, defendants raised triable issues of fact concerning the propriety of the…