From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jul 25, 2000
30 S.W.3d 190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76642.

FILED: July 25, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Robert L. Campbell, Judge.

Annette Llewellyn, 1139 Olive, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper, III, J.



ORDER


Appellant, Wilbur Glass, ("appellant"), appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. Appellant previously appealed his Rule 24.035 motion after it was denied without a hearing. We reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing in Glass v. State, 957 S.W.2d 483 (Mo.App.E.D. 1997). The motion court again denied his motion after the mandated hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Glass v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Jul 25, 2000
30 S.W.3d 190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Glass v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wilber Glass, APPELLANT, v. STATE of Missouri, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Jul 25, 2000

Citations

30 S.W.3d 190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)