In Gladding v. Follett (2 Dem. 58; affd., 30 Hun, 219; affd., 95 N.Y. 652) it appeared that the father of the infant was a bankrupt, and that the mother had property of her own sufficient to support it, and almost wholly maintained the infant.
Summary of this case from Matter of GiegerichArgued January 31, 1884
Decided February 26, 1884
Isaac S. Newton for appellant.
B.J. Scofield for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Gladding v. Follett (2 Dem. 58; affd., 30 Hun, 219; affd., 95 N.Y. 652) it appeared that the father of the infant was a bankrupt, and that the mother had property of her own sufficient to support it, and almost wholly maintained the infant.
Summary of this case from Matter of GiegerichFull title:ALBERT F. GLADDING, as Executor, etc., Appellant, v . LOUISA F. FOLLETT…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 26, 1884
I am of the opinion that the trustees are not called upon so to expend the entire net income. The general…
Matter of GiegerichIn Wilkes v. Rogers (6 Johns. 566) the court held that, after the death of the father, the mother may use the…