From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Givens v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Apr 25, 2018
ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-145-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2018)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-145-Y

04-25-2018

CHRISTY GIVENS v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

On March 30, 2018, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the above-styled and numbered cause. The magistrate judge gave all parties until April 13, 2018, to serve and file with the Court written objections to his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none.

Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED April 25, 2018.

/s/_________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS--Page Solo
TRM/chr


Summaries of

Givens v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Apr 25, 2018
ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-145-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2018)
Case details for

Givens v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTY GIVENS v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Apr 25, 2018

Citations

ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-145-Y (N.D. Tex. Apr. 25, 2018)

Citing Cases

Seals v. Comm'r

Recent courts considering the discretionary duty to recontact have found that, barring any discrepancy or…