From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giraldes v. Beard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 2, 2015
2:14-cv-1780 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)

Opinion


LARRY GIRALDES, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Defendant. No. 2:14-cv-1780 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 2, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed a pro se motion for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 33.) The court recently denied plaintiff's motion for substitution of counsel, determining that it would be in plaintiff's best interest to retain his court-appointed attorney. (ECF No. 32.) As long as plaintiff is represented by counsel, the court will disregard his pro se filings, except as they pertain to the retention of counsel. (See id., n.1.)

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff's pro se motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 33) is denied.


Summaries of

Giraldes v. Beard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 2, 2015
2:14-cv-1780 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Giraldes v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:LARRY GIRALDES, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 2, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-1780 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2015)