From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gioia v. Gioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 9, 1935
245 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

October 9, 1935.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Monroe County.

Dwyer, Reilly, Roberts, McLouth Dicker [ Carroll M. Roberts of counsel], for the appellant.

Louis I. Bunis, for the respondent.

Present — SEARS, P.J., TAYLOR, EDGCOMB, THOMPSON and LEWIS, JJ.


The summons and complaint in this action were served on defendant who understood their contents and destroyed the papers. Defendant is guilty of laches since she did not make this motion until about thirteen months after the final decree was entered. It is clear that defendant has not outlined a meritorious defense to plaintiff's action. If the fact be that she fraudulently participated in bringing about a judgment of divorce against herself in plaintiff's favor, she is barred thereby from the relief she now seeks. ( Kinnier v. Kinnier, 53 Barb. 454; affd., 45 N.Y. 535; Karren v. Karren, 25 Utah, 87; 69 P. 465.) In addition the interests of the innocent second wife of plaintiff and of their child appeal to the conscience of the court.

All concur.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Gioia v. Gioia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 9, 1935
245 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Gioia v. Gioia

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL GIOIA, Sometimes Called SAMUEL JOY, Appellant, v. OLGA CECILIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1935

Citations

245 App. Div. 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
282 N.Y.S. 852

Citing Cases

Bigelow v. Bigelow

The decree was entered on the 22nd day of September, 1947 and became final on the 22nd day of December, 1947.…

Krupinski v. Krupinski

The defendant cross-moved for relief, either (1) opening his default and permitting him to interpose an…