In Ginna v. Second Ave. R. Co. (67 N.Y. 596) the car was so crowded that plaintiff's intestate could not enter it without great discomfort and so he stood upon the platform with his back against the body of the car.
Summary of this case from Cattano v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.Argued November 20, 1876
Decided November 28, 1876
Austen G. Fox for the appellant.
O.P. Buel for the respondent.
ALLEN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Ginna v. Second Ave. R. Co. (67 N.Y. 596) the car was so crowded that plaintiff's intestate could not enter it without great discomfort and so he stood upon the platform with his back against the body of the car.
Summary of this case from Cattano v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co.Full title:MAURICE GINNA, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . THE SECOND AVENUE…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 28, 1876
traordinary. Although to uphold a cause of action it is not necessary to be able to prophesy the extent of…
Moskowitz v. Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.I think that the learned trial court (WHITE, J.) rightly dismissed the plaintiff. An examination of the cases…