From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giliberti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1965
23 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

March 8, 1965


In an action to recover damages for personal injury, defendants Delong Realty Corporation and Emenee Industries, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered February 28, 1964, which denied their motion for leave to amend their answer so as to plead, on behalf of defendant Emenee Industries, Inc., a defense based upon section 11 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, to the effect that plaintiff's exclusive remedy is under the provisions of that statute. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. The amended answer shall be served within 30 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, the denial of the motion by the Special Term was an improvident exercise of discretion ( Dalton v. Michelin, 18 A.D.2d 1138; Van Wie v. Gridley Son, 21 A.D.2d 842; Morris v. Luck, 28 Misc.2d 831; Mitchell v. A.A. Truck Renting Corp., 9 A.D.2d 682). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Giliberti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1965
23 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Giliberti v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CARMELA GILIBERTI, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and DELONG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 666 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Schluter v. Haverstraw Town Tercentennial

efendant's) special employee and therefore plaintiff's exclusive remedy is under the provisions of the…

Ruggiero v. Faulkner

, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 20, 1968, which granted…