From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 2010
625 F.3d 716 (11th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-12513.

November 3, 2010.

George Allen Couture, Stephen J. Langs, Rosemary T. Cakmis, Fed. Pub. Defenders, Orlando, FL, for Gilbert.

Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, David Paul Rhodes, U.S. Atty., Linda Julin McNamara, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, FL, for U.S.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 99-02054-CV-T-30-TGW); James S. Moody, Jr., Judge.

(Opinion June 21, 2010, 609 F.3d 1159, 11th Cir. 2010)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

Judge Charles R. Wilson has recused himself and will not participate. Senior United States Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).


A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 2010
625 F.3d 716 (11th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Gilbert v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Ezell GILBERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 2010

Citations

625 F.3d 716 (11th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Mitchell

There are three reasons that petitioner's argument fails: (1) petitioner has failed to argue or provide…

Woods v. Pearson

The Court notes that the apparent version of the Gilbert opinion relied on by the Petitioner was vacated by…