From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Feb 19, 1929
97 Cal.App. 42 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)

Opinion

Docket No. 6151.

February 19, 1929.

MOTION to dismiss appeal from judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and motion for leave to file brief. Guy F. Bush, Judge Presiding. Motion for leave to file brief denied. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

James E. Fenton for Appellant.

Julius Patrosso and C.C. Mishler for Respondent.


This matter comes up on a notice of motion to dismiss appeal. The record discloses the fact that the transcript herein was filed on July 19, 1928; that the notice to dismiss the appeal and the affidavit supporting the motion were filed on January 16, 1929, and thereafter, on January 24, 1929, the appellant tendered to the court his so-called appellant's opening brief for filing, which was not filed by the clerk, but was held by him and was presented to this court at the time that the notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was heard. It was referred to in the affidavit of James E. Fenton, attorney for appellant, as stating the correct and true basis of his appeal, and is practically used by him in lieu of an affidavit of merits to support the motion for leave to file such brief of appellant, which motion was heard at the same time that the motion to dismiss the appeal came on for hearing.

[1] In accordance with the rules of this court, the appellant is in default in failing to file the brief on time. The neglect shown cannot be considered as excusable.

The motion for leave to file brief is denied, and the motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

Houser, Acting P.J., and Crail, J., pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Feb 19, 1929
97 Cal.App. 42 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
Case details for

Gilbert v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. GILBERT, Respondent, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Feb 19, 1929

Citations

97 Cal.App. 42 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929)
274 P. 1023

Citing Cases

Shanfeld v. Munson

The respondents are entitled to a dismissal of the appeal. ( McCabe v. Healey, 139 Cal. 30 [ 72 P. 359];…

Clinton v. Shaw

) In the Chapman and Hoyt cases it was held that the filing of a brief or transcript after the service of…