From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 12, 2005
362 Ark. 657 (Ark. 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-65.

Opinion delivered June 16, 2005. Rehearing denied December 12, 2005.

APPEAL ERROR — ABBREVIATED RECORD — TACIT AGREEMENT — SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD AND BRIEF ORDERED. — Where the record was abbreviated due to the materials requested by appellant in her notice of appeal and designation of the record, but where appellee failed to object to the limited appeal and did not file a designation of any additional materials, thus tacitly agreeing to the abbreviated record, the court ordered appellant to supply a certified, supplemental record that includes a transcript of the December 17, 2004 hearing and to file a substituted brief that includes an abstract of the relevant testimony and argument of counsel that is essential to the court's understanding of the case and issue presented.

Appeal from Union Circuit Court; Edward P. Jones, Judge; certified supplemental record ordered; rebriefing ordered.

William C. Plouffe, Jr., for appellant.

Bennett Bennett, by: James B. Bennett, for appellee.


Appellant Vassie Gilbert appeals the order of the Union County Circuit Court awarding temporary custody of her minor son to Appellee Damarcus Moore. The issue on appeal is whether Appellee had standing to seek an award of temporary custody where he had not been declared as the putative father of the minor child by any court order. We are unable to reach the merits of Appellant's argument as she failed to file a sufficient record for our review pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 6.

The record on appeal contains the temporary order of custody. Therein, the order states that a hearing was held on December 17, 2004, and that the trial court relied upon "the petition, testimony, statements of counsel, and other matters and things before the Court" in rendering its decision. The trial court then found that the "[defendant's claim that the Court lacked jurisdiction to award custody to the Plaintiff because of a lack of standing pursuant to A.C.A. 9-10-113, is denied. The presumption in favor of custody of the mother is overcome by the evidence." While the petition and answer are included in the record, there is no transcript from the hearing.

Pursuant to Rule 6(c), "this court shall not affirm or dismiss a case based on an abbreviated record if the record was abbreviated by the parties in good faith either by agreement or without objection from the appellee." West v. West, 362 Ark. 456, 457, 208 S.W.3d 776, 778 (2005) ( per curiam). Further, pursuant to Rule 6(e), this court can sua sponte direct the parties to supply any omitted material by filing a certified, supplemental record. See id. [1] In order for this court to adequately review the circuit court's temporary award of custody, we must have before us the evidence upon which the circuit court relied in making its decision. We recognize that the record presently before us is abbreviated due to the materials requested by Appellant in her notice of appeal and designation of the record, but Appellee failed to object to the limited appeal, nor did he file a designation of any additional materials he believed should have been included in the record. Thus, Appellee tacitly consented to the record. See, e.g., West, 362 Ark. 456, 208 S.W.3d 776.

Pursuant to Rule 6(c) and (e), we order Appellant to supply this court with a certified, supplemental record that includes a transcript of the hearing held before the circuit court on December 17, 2004, within sixty days of the issuance of this opinion.

Appellant is further ordered to file a substituted brief that includes an abstract of the relevant testimony and argument of counsel that is essential to this court's understanding of the case and issue presented, as required by Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(5) and (a)(8).


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Moore

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 12, 2005
362 Ark. 657 (Ark. 2005)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:Vassie GILBERT v. Damarcus MOORE

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 12, 2005

Citations

362 Ark. 657 (Ark. 2005)
210 S.W.3d 125

Citing Cases

Wine v. Chandler

Further, pursuant to Rule 6(e), this court can sua sponte direct the parties to supply any omitted material…

Thomas v. Avant

Pursuant to Rule 6(c), "this court shall not affirm or dismiss a case based on an abbreviated record if the…