From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 16, 1934
152 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)

Opinion

May 16, 1934.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Samuel Schleimer, for the appellant.

Maurice B. Gladstone, for the respondent.


An action in conversion for damages for unlawful repossession of the automobile of plaintiff's assignor is not one to recover possession of a specific chattel or chattels as provided in rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 5, so as to warrant the granting of a motion for summary judgment brought under this and rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

All concur; present, HAMMER, CALLAHAN and SHIENTAG, JJ.


Summaries of

Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 16, 1934
152 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
Case details for

Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ZELMER A. GILBERT, Respondent, v. GOTHAM CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 16, 1934

Citations

152 Misc. 598 (N.Y. App. Term 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 815

Citing Cases

Progressive Cr. v. Mt. Vernon Cloth Corp.

Moreover, even if plaintiff would have us consider the complaint as alleging a cause of action for conversion…

Messina v. Turrito

The court denied defendant's motion but granted plaintiff's motion, struck out defendant's answer and ordered…