From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. Fleishbein

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 7, 1952
231 Ind. 179 (Ind. 1952)

Opinion

No. 28,982.

Filed October 7, 1952.

MANDAMUS — Petition — Form, Requisites and Sufficiency — Failure To Set Forth Pleading, Orders and Entries. — In an original mandamus action seeking relief relative to a proceeding in an inferior court, a petition is insufficient which fails to set out, or have attached thereto as exhibits, certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter in the lower court. Rules of the Supreme Court, 2-35.

Original action by Hugh T. Gibson against J.A. Fleishbein as Special Judge of the LaPorte Circuit Court, for a writ of mandamus.

Petition denied.

Hugh T. Gibson, pro se.


The relator, appearing pro se, files an instrument entitled "Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandate" whereby he seeks to compel certain action by the respondent Judge.

The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, but wholly fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 2-35.

The issuance of the writ is therefore denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 108 N.E.2d 57.


Summaries of

Gibson v. Fleishbein

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 7, 1952
231 Ind. 179 (Ind. 1952)
Case details for

Gibson v. Fleishbein

Case Details

Full title:GIBSON v. FLEISHBEIN, JUDGE

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Oct 7, 1952

Citations

231 Ind. 179 (Ind. 1952)
108 N.E.2d 57

Citing Cases

Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'n

All reasonable presumptions are indulged in favor of the rulings and judgment of the trial court, and the…

N.Y. Central Ry. Co. v. Milhiser

Bobbitt, J., not participating. NOTE. — Reported in 108 N.E.2d 57. CONCURRING…