From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. McRide Cab Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 2004
10 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-08259

September 20, 2004.

Before: Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated August 14, 2003, as granted the motion of the defendant McRide Cab Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant McRide Cab Co.

The motion of the defendant McRide Cab Co. for summary judgment, made almost six months after the note of issue was filed, failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 3212 (a). The absence of prejudice to the plaintiff did not constitute good cause for the delay ( see Brill v. City of New York, 2 NY3d 648).


Summaries of

Gibbs v. McRide Cab Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 20, 2004
10 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Gibbs v. McRide Cab Co.

Case Details

Full title:EADEL A. GIBBS, Appellant, v. McRIDE CAB CO., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 20, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 747

Citing Cases

Deans v. Nassau Cnty. Pub. Adm'r

"The absence of prejudice to the plaintiff did not constitute good cause for the delay." See Gibbs v. McRide…

Slane v. Kalache

In Brill, however, the Court of Appeals held that in the absence of a "good cause" showing for the delay, the…