From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gershon v. Back

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 15, 2021
337 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

06-15-2021

Elana GERSHON v. Ronald BACK

James P. Sexton, Hartford, and Julia K. Conlin, in support of the petition. Joseph T. O'Connor, Stamford, in opposition.


James P. Sexton, Hartford, and Julia K. Conlin, in support of the petition.

Joseph T. O'Connor, Stamford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 201 Conn. App. 225, 242 A.3d 481, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that a New York law is substantive rather than procedural for choice-of-law purposes when that law would require a litigant in the parties’ circumstances who is seeking to obtain postjudgment relief in a marital dissolution case to file a plenary action rather than a motion to open the dissolution judgment?"

ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Gershon v. Back

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 15, 2021
337 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

Gershon v. Back

Case Details

Full title:Elana GERSHON v. Ronald BACK

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 15, 2021

Citations

337 Conn. 901 (Conn. 2021)
252 A.3d 364

Citing Cases

Kinity v. U.S. Bancorp

Whether Audubon applies is a pure question of law to which we apply plenary review. See Gershon v. Back , 201…

Gershon v. Back

We subsequently granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue:…