From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

German v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1995
211 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Summary

In German, the plaintiff brought an action against the Pope and others to recover on a tort claim and for breach of contract in connection with membership as a priest within a religious community.

Summary of this case from Baer v. Chase

Opinion

January 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.).


Although the motion court based its statute of limitations determinations on the erroneous conclusion that plaintiff had resigned from the priesthood in January 1987, plaintiff concedes in the complaint that it was in 1965 or 1966 that he first became aware of certain alleged improprieties within the religious community that allegedly give rise to his causes of action for fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and tortious interference with, or inducement of breach of contract, as well as his claim for quantum meruit compensation in connection with his membership within the religious community. Thus, the first five causes of action were properly dismissed as not timely brought by this action, which was commenced on July 30, 1993, at least 27 years after the alleged causes of action arose. To the extent that plaintiff's claim of tortious interference with, or inducement of breach of contract is addressed to a job that plaintiff held for an unspecified time during 1993, although such an action would not be time-barred, plaintiff has failed to state a viable cause of action supported by factual allegations that any of the named defendants acted intentionally to cause plaintiff to lose his job without privilege or justification (see, Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 129, at 991 [5th ed]).

The above determinations render plaintiff's additional claims of error moot.

We note that to the extent plaintiff's claims are based upon his allegation that the various defendants failed to fulfill their promises to provide plaintiff with the opportunity to "live his life within the religious community in accordance with the vows and the established principles of the [Roman Catholic Church]", such matters may not properly be determined by a civil court (see, Serbian Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696; Morris v. Scribner, 69 N.Y.2d 418, 422).

Concur — Wallach, J.P., Rubin, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

German v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 10, 1995
211 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

In German, the plaintiff brought an action against the Pope and others to recover on a tort claim and for breach of contract in connection with membership as a priest within a religious community.

Summary of this case from Baer v. Chase

dismissing quantum meruit claim because plaintiff "first became aware" of the actions giving rise to that claim more than six years before suit

Summary of this case from Steudtner v. Duane Reade, Inc.
Case details for

German v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:TERENCE GERMAN, Appellant, v. POPE JOHN PAUL, II, et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 10, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 311

Citing Cases

Steudtner v. Duane Reade, Inc.

Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of Montreal, 615 N.E.2d 985, 986 (N.Y. 1993). And though the limitations period…

Steudtner v. Duane Reade, Inc.

If, however, the person seeking compensation learned at an earlier date that compensation was not going to be…