From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gephardt v. Morgan Guar. Tr. Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1993
191 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 9, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


It is well settled that a defense based on documentary evidence can succeed if the documents submitted resolve all of the factual issues as a matter of law (Standard Chartered Bank v. D. Chabbott, Inc., 178 A.D.2d 112). The clear and unambiguous language contained in the documents relied on by the moving parties established not only the existence of fee schedules for the defendant depository institutions but defendants' entitlement to charge a service fee of $.03 per share for the issuance and cancellation of American Depository Receipts, a Federally regulated type of security representing ownership of securities issued by a foreign company.

Plaintiffs have not shown that the fees imposed were unconscionable or constituted a breach of an implied duty of good faith (see, Holmes Protection v. Provident Loan Socy., 179 A.D.2d 400).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Gephardt v. Morgan Guar. Tr. Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1993
191 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Gephardt v. Morgan Guar. Tr. Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS E. GEPHARDT et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 229 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 248

Citing Cases

YM Antiques, Inc. v. Monr51, LLC

The test on a CPLR 3211 (a)(1) motion is whether the documentary evidence submitted "conclusively establishes…

WILSON v. STRUCTURE TONE, INC.

The test on a CPLR 3211 [a] [1] motion is whether the documentary evidence submitted "conclusively…