From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Georgia State Board of Pharmacy v. Purvis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 8, 1980
271 S.E.2d 870 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

59700.

ARGUED APRIL 15, 1980.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1980.

Administrative appeal. Cook Superior Court. Before Judge Knight.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John C. Jones, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Edward Parrish, for appellee.


We granted this interlocutory appeal to determine whether judicial review of a decision of the State Board of Pharmacy can be obtained in a county other than Fulton County. Appellant Board of Pharmacy argues that under Code § 79A-830, judicial review can only be obtained in Fulton County. Code § 79A-830 provides: "All final determinations, findings and conclusions of the Board of Pharmacy under this Chapter are final and conclusive decisions of the matters involved. Any person aggrieved by the decision may obtain review of the decision in Fulton County Superior Court. Findings of fact by the Board of Pharmacy, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive." (Emphasis supplied.) Appellee contends that, because the language of Code § 79A-830 is not mandatory, judicial review is permissible under Ga. L. 1964, pp. 338, 354 (Code Ann. § 3A-120 (b)), which provides that a "petition [for review] may be filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County or in the superior court of the county of residence of the petitioner."

Appellee sought judicial review of the Board's decision in the Superior Court of Cook County. The court denied appellant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Ga. L. 1964, pp. 338, 356 (Code Ann. § 3A-121) states: "An aggrieved party may obtain review of any final judgment of the superior court under this Act by the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, as provided by law." (Emphasis supplied.) In Howell v. Harden, 231 Ga. 594, 595 ( 203 S.E.2d 206) (1974), the Georgia Supreme Court held: "The Administrative Procedure Act does not authorize a review under that Act except on `final' judgment by the reviewing court. Therefore, this portion of the Court of Appeals judgment indicating that the judgment might be subject to review on a certification by the reviewing superior court is erroneous." See also Ga. Consumer Center v. Ga. Power Co., 150 Ga. App. 511, 512 ( 258 S.E.2d 250) (1979). We reluctantly conclude that the appeal in the instant case must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. McMurray, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

ARGUED APRIL 15, 1980 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1980.


Summaries of

Georgia State Board of Pharmacy v. Purvis

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 8, 1980
271 S.E.2d 870 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Georgia State Board of Pharmacy v. Purvis

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY v. PURVIS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 8, 1980

Citations

271 S.E.2d 870 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)
271 S.E.2d 870

Citing Cases

State Health Planning Review Bd. v. Piedmont Hosp

The Supreme Court further held in Howell v. Harden, supra, that a superior court order remanding a case back…

Hardison v. Booth

At the same time that it denied the Department's motion to dismiss the appeal, the superior court remanded…