George Palm Construction Co. v. Bahr

Full title: GEORGE PALM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. EDWARD BAHR…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 27, 1933

166 A. 166 (N.J. 1933)

166 A. 166

Opinion

Submitted February 17, 1933 —

Decided April 27, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 756.

For the prosecutor-appellant, Emil Neblo.

For the defendant-respondent, Kalisch Kalisch.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. See, also, Thomas v. Liondale Bleach, Dye and Print Works, 10 N.J. Mis. R. 255.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.