From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 2, 1995
218 Ga. App. 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

A95A1649.

DECIDED AUGUST 2, 1995.

Motion to suppress. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Stoddard.

Al Johnson, for appellant.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Bruce D. Hornbuckle, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


Defendant filed this direct appeal after the denial of his motion to suppress. Held:

"Although the defendant obtained a certificate of review from the trial judge, he failed to make an application to this Court for interlocutory review within 10 days after the grant of the certificate. Since an order denying a motion to suppress is not a final judgment ( Cody v. State, 116 Ga. App. 331 ( 157 S.E.2d 496) (1967)), this [direct] appeal is premature and thus is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Williams v. State, 148 Ga. App. 176 ( 251 S.E.2d 130) (1978)." Holton v. State, 173 Ga. App. 249 ( 326 S.E.2d 240). Accordingly, this direct appeal is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Andrews and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

DECIDED AUGUST 2, 1995.


Summaries of

Genter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 2, 1995
218 Ga. App. 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Genter v. State

Case Details

Full title:GENTER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Aug 2, 1995

Citations

218 Ga. App. 311 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995)
460 S.E.2d 879

Citing Cases

Vidal v. State

Moreover, under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from "[a]ll final judgments, that is…

Sawyer v. State

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), an application for interlocutory appeal must be filed within ten days of the trial…