From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geller v. Port Jefferson Obstetrics

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 2002
294 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

01-05340

Submitted February 4, 2002

May 28, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated May 7, 2001, which granted the motion of the defendants Port Jefferson Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.C., Donald F. Bruhn, Frank R. Collier, Philip J. Markowski, M.D., P.C., Frank Raphael Collier, Philip J. Markowski, and Stephen Golub, inter alia, to strike their note of issue to the extent of striking their amended bills of particulars.

Pegalis Erickson, LLC, Lake Success, N.Y. (Rhonda L. Meyer of counsel), for appellants.

Geisler Gabriele, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Lori Marano and Catherine Sammartino of counsel), for respondents.

SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

Pursuant to CPLR 3042(b), a party may serve an amended bill of particulars, as of right, once before the filing of a note of issue. Such an amendment "'can make any change at all in the bill,'" and enables a party to include whatever could have been included in the original bill of particulars (Martinovics v. New York City Health and Hosps. Corp., 285 A.D.2d 532, 535, quoting Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR 3042:14 at 538). Since the plaintiffs served their first amended bills of particulars prior to the filing of the note of issue and service of the first amended bills of particulars was not prohibited by the preliminary conference order signed by the parties, the amended bills should have been allowed (see Martinovics v. New York City Health and Hosps. Corp., supra; Dubose v. New York City Health and Hosps. Corp., 229 A.D.2d 312; Torre v. Cifarelli, 157 A.D.2d 713).

The respondents' alternative contention is without merit.

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Geller v. Port Jefferson Obstetrics

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 2002
294 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Geller v. Port Jefferson Obstetrics

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GELLER, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PORT JEFFERSON OBSTETRICS AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

Tanriverdi v. United Skates of Am., Inc.

Further, the "Amended Second Supplemental Bill of Particulars" are herewith deemed served. To the extent that…

Lachow v. City of New York

CPLR 3042 (b) provides that "[i]n any action . . . in which a note of issue is required to be filed, a party…