From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelatt v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1991
585 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1255.

September 10, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, D. Bruce Levy, J.

Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder, Fort Lauderdale, Gail L. Grossman, Miami, for appellant.

Robin H. Greene, Helen L. Stone, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.


We reverse the final judgment terminating parental rights because the record demonstrates that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services did not give notice of the March 15, 1991 dispositional hearing as required by statute. A person required to be served with notice as prescribed by section 39.462(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), is entitled to notice of hearings. § 39.462(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). Failure to furnish appellant notice of the disposition hearing rendered the entry of the judgment terminating her parental rights improper.

Reversed and remanded.

BASKIN and LEVY, JJ., concur.


I agree with the result reached by the majority. I write specially because, in my view, the trial court should have proceeded to trial on counsel's representations that she was ready to proceed on behalf of the mother. This case has been mishandled by HRS from the outset, and the result is that the child must spend still another year in a foster home.


Summaries of

Gelatt v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 10, 1991
585 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Gelatt v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Case Details

Full title:DONNA GELATT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 10, 1991

Citations

585 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

W.K. v. Dept. of Children Families

Certainly the client had a duty to advise the attorney of her change of address. The mother argues that this…

M.E. v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services

Certainly the client had a duty to advise the attorney of her change of address. The mother argues that this…