From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1944
56 N.E.2d 558 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued June 5, 1944

Decided July 19, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, MILLER, J.

Eli J. Blair and Sidney B. Cardozo for appellant.

Louis B. Brodsky and Saul Gordon for respondent.


No motion was made by the defendant at the close of the case for dismissal of the complaint or direction of a verdict. This was a concession by the defendant that there was evidence which warranted submission of the case to the jury. In that state of the record, the Appellate Division was without power to dismiss the complaint. ( Eno v. Klein, 236 N.Y. 543.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified so as to order a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1944
56 N.E.2d 558 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Gelardin v. Flomarcy Co.

Case Details

Full title:JACQUES GELARDIN, Appellant, v. FLOMARCY COMPANY, INC., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 1944

Citations

56 N.E.2d 558 (N.Y. 1944)
56 N.E.2d 558

Citing Cases

Matter of McCrea

Moreover here the broker gave up all hope of selling the premises in question to the purchaser and did not…

DOOR KNOB REALTY v. NORTHROP

when he has produced a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase upon the seller's terms (Lane-Real Estate…