From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 1996
228 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 10, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion of GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc., which was for summary judgment against Michael J. Taylor is denied.

The appellant made a loan to Diane Jones (hereinafter the owner) to enable her to make certain home improvements and to qualify for a larger loan upon refinancing. The loan was secured by a second mortgage held by the appellant and was recorded on December 20, 1989. On July 16, 1990, the owner refinanced her house and obtained a mortgage loan from the plaintiff, GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc. (hereinafter GE Capital). Thereafter, the owner defaulted on her loan from GE Capital and this action was commenced by GE Capital to foreclose the mortgage.

GE Capital asserts that, at the closing on July 16, 1990, a representative of the title company stated that the appellant's mortgage had been satisfied and consequently omitted the appellant's mortgage as an exception to title. GE Capital further asserts that this representative had the apparent authority to bind the appellant. The appellant contends that he did, in fact, have dealings with the representative, but that he never authorized this individual to subordinate his mortgage lien to the mortgage lien of GE Capital.

GE Capital failed to produce competent evidence of words or conduct of the appellant that would have given rise to the appearance and belief that the title company representative possessed authority to enter into a transaction (see, Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 231; Melstein v. Schmid Labs., 116 A.D.2d 632, 634; see also, Ford v. Unity Hosp., 32 N.Y.2d 464; Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public Natl. Bank Trust Co., 260 N.Y. 84, 92-93). Accordingly, the branch of the motion of GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc., which was for summary judgment against the appellant should have been denied. Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 10, 1996
228 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

GE Capital Mortgage Service, Inc. v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICE, INC., Respondent, v. MICHAEL J. TAYLOR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 10, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

The Economist's Advocate LLC v. Cognitive Arts Corp.

Associated Dry Goods Crop, v. Towers Financial Corp. No. 88 Civ. 9178, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12253, at *10…

150 Beach 120th St. v. Wa. Brooklyn

The appellants Washington Brooklyn Limited Partnership, Freedom SLP, LP, and Freedom Tax Credit Plus, LP…