From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayle v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jul 6, 1982
635 S.W.2d 478 (Ky. 1982)

Opinion

July 6, 1982.

On review from the Court of Appeals.

John G. Crutchfield, Ewen, MacKenzie Peden, Louisville, for movant.

C. Dant Kearns, Robert G. Breetz, Stites, McElwain Fowler, Louisville, for respondent.


The respondent insurance carrier, having paid two workers' compensation claims totalling $986.95, brought suit against an alleged third-party tortfeasor for indemnity. The suit was dismissed because the amount of the claim fell below the threshold limit fixed by KRS 304.39-060(2)(b), a part of the "no-fault" Motor Vehicle Reparations Act. The circuit court affirmed, but the Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion reversed on the theory that the insurance company has an independent common-law right of indemnity which cannot be abolished by statute.

The fundamental issue is the same as in Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Government Employees Insurance Company, Ky., 635 S.W.2d 475, decided today. Our decision in that case requires a reversal in this one.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the judgment of the circuit court affirming the trial court is affirmed.

All concur.


Summaries of

Gayle v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Jul 6, 1982
635 S.W.2d 478 (Ky. 1982)
Case details for

Gayle v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Case Details

Full title:James R. GAYLE, Movant, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Kentucky

Date published: Jul 6, 1982

Citations

635 S.W.2d 478 (Ky. 1982)

Citing Cases

Jefferson County Board v. Estate of Cowles

This issue is apparently one of first impression in this commonwealth. Cowles relies on Gayle v. United…