From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayden v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

December 23, 1988

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ. (Order entered Dec. 15, 1988.)


Motion for an extension of time and for other relief denied. Memorandum: Respondent may not unilaterally withdraw his stipulation to the record on appeal. The proper practice is to move to vacate the stipulation and settle the record. The motion to stay the argument of the appeal is denied and the case will remain on the calendar for argument on the January Term unless by January 5, 1989 respondent has obtained an order from the trial court vacating the stipulation and settling the record.


Summaries of

Gayden v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1988
145 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Gayden v. City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:DON GAYDEN, Respondent, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1988

Citations

145 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Johnson

Addressing first appeal Nos. 2 and 3, we reject the father's contention in those appeals that Family Court…