From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaskill v. Montague

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 6, 1961
128 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 60-521.

April 6, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, George E. Holt, J.

Carey, Goodman, Terry, Dwyer Austin, Miami, for appellant.

Donald F. Frost and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellees.


In this action for damages for personal injuries a jury verdict rendered for the defendant was set aside and plaintiffs' motion for new trial was granted. No grounds were stated in the order, as they are required to be by § 59.07(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A. Defendant's appeal assigned as error the failure of the order granting new trial to state any grounds therefor. See Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla. 1951, 53 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla. 1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge Iron, Inc., Fla.App. 1960, 122 So.2d 240.

The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions, as provided for in said § 59.04, id., "that final judgment be entered in the trial court for the party obtaining the verdict, unless motion in arrest of judgment or for judgment non obstante veredicto be made and prevail."

Reversed and remanded.

HORTON, C.J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and SMITH, D.R., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Gaskill v. Montague

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 6, 1961
128 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Gaskill v. Montague

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GORDON GASKILL, APPELLANT, v. EDITH MONTAGUE AND JAMES F. MONTAGUE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 6, 1961

Citations

128 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

Morton v. Staples

"The direction in § 59.07(4), Fla. Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., that `the trial judge shall…

Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc.

The record in this cause furnished no basis upon which non-compliance may be excused. Ebersole v. Tepperman,…