From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-033-CG (S.D. Ala. Oct. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-033-CG CRIMINAL NO. 07-00349-CG-C

2013-10-04

RAMON GARZA, JR., Petitioner/Defendant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody filed in this case (Doc. 201 in Criminal 7-349-CG-C) be and the same hereby is DENIED because, as to the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, the petitioner has made no showing that his rights were violated and any claim of cumulative error similarly fails.

Further, the petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Garza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-033-CG (S.D. Ala. Oct. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Garza v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAMON GARZA, JR., Petitioner/Defendant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-033-CG (S.D. Ala. Oct. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Williams v. United States

A defendant must point to the testimony that allegedly violated the Confrontation Clause and show that it is…

Blackley v. United States

Therefore, Smith's ineffective assistance of counsel claim cannot prevail." (citations omitted)); cf. Garza…