From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 9, 1990
567 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2878.

October 9, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Roy T. Gelber, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Anita J. Gay, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


Defendant Charles Garvin appeals the trial court's determination that he is a habitual offender, contending that findings were not made as contemplated by section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989). Upon review of the sentencing transcript, it appears that the procedure followed below was substantially similar to that involved in Parker v. State, 421 So.2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), except that the 1989 statute, applicable here, no longer requires a finding that imposition of sentence under the habitual offender statute is necessary for the protection of the public. A presentence investigation was obtained, and defendant offered no objection with respect to the prior criminal history which served as the basis for the habitual offender determination.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Garvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 9, 1990
567 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Garvin v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. GARVIN, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 556 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

The finding that appellant is a violent habitual offender was sufficient. It is unnecessary, in crimes…

Wearry v. State

The trial court did not depart from the procedural requirements of the habitual offender law. See King v.…