From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garofano Construction Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1962
183 N.E.2d 228 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued April 4, 1962

Decided May 10, 1962

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, SAUL S. STREIT, J., SAMUEL J. JOSEPH, J.

Edward J. Bloustein and Albert Foreman for appellants-respondents.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Seymour B. Quel and Milton H. Harris of counsel), for respondent-appellant.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents in part and votes to reverse the judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiffs and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that, as matter of law, the contract between the parties does not transfer to plaintiffs any equipment on the premises to which the city itself did not obtain title. Taking no part: Judge BURKE.


Summaries of

Garofano Construction Co. v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1962
183 N.E.2d 228 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Garofano Construction Co. v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:GAROFANO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 10, 1962

Citations

183 N.E.2d 228 (N.Y. 1962)
183 N.E.2d 228
228 N.Y.S.2d 826

Citing Cases

Warfield v. Conti

In deciding the motion, the court must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party and…

U.S. Life Ins. Co. in N.Y. v. Menche

A party seeking summary judgment must make a prima facie case showing that it is entitled to judgment as a…