From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garland v. Titan West Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1990
165 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 25, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Baer, Jr., J.).


Plaintiffs, tenants of store premises located at 1030 Amsterdam Avenue in Manhattan, commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the sublease of the demised premises was in accordance with the terms of the overlease and that the assignment of the sublease had been cured by an agreement between the parties thereto voiding the assignment.

Upon a prior appeal in this matter (Garland v. Titan W. Assocs., 147 A.D.2d 304), which was concerned with plaintiffs' application for Yellowstone injunctive relief, this court identified certain issues which required trial. Plaintiffs, on their motion for summary judgment, have not come forward with any evidence which disposes of those issues. Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied by the IAS court.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Garland v. Titan West Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1990
165 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Garland v. Titan West Associates

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GARLAND et al., Appellants, v. TITAN WEST ASSOCIATES et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

SB Petroleum, Inc. v. Gizem Realty Corp.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' cross motion to terminate the lease and evict SB Petroleum,…

Kaygreen Realty Co. v. IG Second Generation Partners, L.P.

) This Court finds that there are numerous issues of fact that preclude a finding of summary judgment for…