From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gardner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Dec 29, 1998
983 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 74683

December 29, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY, HONORABLE WILLIAM L. SYLER, JUDGE.

Emmett D. Queener, Public Defender, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, Missouri 65201-3724, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Attorney General, 201 W. High Street, Sup. Ct. Bldg., St. Louis, MO 63105, for respondent.

Before Hoff, P.J., Gaertner, and Russell, JJ.


ORDER


Appellant, Kyle D. Gardner ("movant"), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. In his prior appeal, State v. Gardner, 952 S.W.2d 384 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997), we remanded movant's Rule 29.15 motion to the motion court for entry of specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. Movant now asks us to review those specific findings and conclusions. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.


Summaries of

Gardner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Dec 29, 1998
983 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Gardner v. State

Case Details

Full title:KYLE D. GARDNER, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Dec 29, 1998

Citations

983 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)