Opinion
No. 14-04-00063-CR
Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 263rd District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 951,060. Affirmed.
Panel consists of Justices YATES, EDELMAN, and GUZMAN.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a bench trial, appellant was convicted of assault of a public servant and sentenced on January 26, 2004 to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a written notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was delivered a copy of the record to review but did not file a pro se response. We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.