Summary
concluding that although the ALJ found that the claimant had moderate difficulties in concentration, persistence or pace he did not account for the limitation in the RFC, and he failed to explain how the RFC determination reflected the claimant's limitations in concentration, persistence or pace, or why moderate limitations in concentration, persistence or pace did not impact the claimant's ability to work
Summary of this case from Hyatt v. ColvinOpinion
No. 5:14-CV-842-FL
01-25-2016
SENAIDA GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which no objections were filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered January 25, 2016, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. This Judgment Filed and Entered on January 25 , 2016, and Copies To:
Jonathan Blair Biser (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Cassia W. Parson (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) January 25, 2016
JULIE RICHARDS JOHNSTON, CLERK
/s/ Christa N. Baker
(By) Christa N. Baker, Deputy Clerk