From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garbey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 9, 1964
397 P.2d 523 (Okla. Crim. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. A-13549.

December 9, 1964.

Appeal from the Municipal Criminal Court of City of Tulsa; Ralph R. Adkisson, Judge.

Sidney Sam Edward Garbey was convicted of Sale of Beer to Minors, and appeals. Affirmed.

Wheeler Wheeler, Tulsa, for plaintiff in error.

Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen., Hugh H. Collum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.


Sidney Sam Edward Garbey was charged in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Tulsa by Information with the offense of Sale of Beer to Minors in violation of Title 37 O.S. § 241[ 37-241] and was tried by jury, found guilty and his punishment was fixed at ninety days in the county jail and a fine of $300.00.

A timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

We feel this is a case where it is unnecessary to recite the evidence or the law but that in order to speed up the disposition of the many cases pending on appeal, the case should properly be disposed of by memorandum opinion, as authorized by the Legislature, 20 O.S.(1951) § 47, as amended 1953; for as was said in Nichols v. State, 97 Okla. Cr. 414, 264 P.2d 366:

"In a misdemeanor case, where a careful reading of the briefs of the appellant and the State, as well as a careful examination of the record or casemade, discloses no reversible error, and where there is ample evidence to support the verdict of the jury (or judgment of the court in absence of the jury), and judgment rendered, this court may affirm such judgment by summary order, or brief statement, or by opinion of length, as the court may see fit. Tit. 20 O.S. 1951 § 47[ 20-47], as amended by S.B. 450, § 2, 1953 Legislature."

We have carefully examined the record and excellent briefs of counsel and are of the opinion that the evidence, though conflicting, supports the findings of the jury, and that the record is free from fundamental error. We are of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, P.J., and NIX, J., concur.


Summaries of

Garbey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 9, 1964
397 P.2d 523 (Okla. Crim. App. 1964)
Case details for

Garbey v. State

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY SAM EDWARD GARBEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 9, 1964

Citations

397 P.2d 523 (Okla. Crim. App. 1964)
1964 OK CR 119

Citing Cases

Oliver v. State

Oral argument was waived and this case was submitted on the record and briefs of the respective parties. In…

Meade v. Oklahoma City

"In a misdemeanor case, where a careful reading of the briefs of the appellant and the State, as well as a…