From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GANS v. ROZUM

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-62J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-62J.

August 31, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Kevin Gans' complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was received by the Court on March 14, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on July 20, 2007, recommended that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment be granted. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. The Plaintiff filed Objections on August 8, 2007 (Doc. 59).

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections filed, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2007,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) are GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, (Doc. 58), dated July 20, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

GANS v. ROZUM

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 31, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-62J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)
Case details for

GANS v. ROZUM

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN GANS, Plaintiff, v. GERALD L. ROZUM, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 31, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-62J (W.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

Warren v. Zickefoose

In any event, the mere temporal connection between Petitioners' litigation and their transfers is not…

Vines v. Columbus House

Furthermore, aside from bare allegations, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint fails to provide facts that would…