From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gandy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 4, 2018
239 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17–3133

04-04-2018

Ezekiel GANDY, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Ezekiel Gandy filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), claiming that his Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet was inaccurate because its prior record section incorrectly listed offenses for which he had not been convicted. The postconviction court denied the motion because it would have required an evidentiary hearing. However, Gandy's claim would be cognizable in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and it would be timely as such. See Thomas v. State, 149 So.3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the postconviction court to allow Gandy the opportunity to raise the claim in a facially sufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, if he has not already done so. See id.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

SILBERMAN and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Gandy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 4, 2018
239 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Gandy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ezekiel GANDY, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Apr 4, 2018

Citations

239 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)