From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gandolfi v. City of Yonkers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 995 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1984

Decided June 29, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Matthew F. Coppola, J.

Henry J. Logan, County Attorney ( Kenneth E. Powell and Lester D. Steinman of counsel), for County of Westchester, appellant.

Arthur J. Doran, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Joseph E. St. Onge of counsel), for City of Yonkers, appellant.

Barbara Gunther, Corporation Counsel, for City of Mount Vernon, appellant.

Maxwell E. Charat, Corporation Counsel ( Stephen J. Mignano of counsel), for City of New Rochelle, appellant.

Frederick J. Adler for Valentino Gandolfi and others, respondents.

Jonathan Lovett for Platzner Organization and others, respondents.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( August L. Fietkau, Peter H. Schiff and Richard G. Liskov of counsel), in his statutory capacity pursuant to section 71 of the Executive Law.



Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Vito J. Titone at the Appellate Division ( 101 A.D.2d 188). Question certified insofar as it relates to action No. 1 answered in the affirmative, and question certified insofar as it relates to action No. 2 not answered as unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Gandolfi v. City of Yonkers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 29, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 995 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Gandolfi v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:VALENTINO GANDOLFI et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF YONKERS, Defendant, and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 29, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 995 (N.Y. 1984)
479 N.Y.S.2d 517
468 N.E.2d 699

Citing Cases

Keyspan Generation, LLC v. Nassau County

Instead, these cases stand for the more limited proposition that, where a municipality has reasonably relied…

Bailey v. State of North Carolina

than examination of general protest of class of plaintiffs; court therefore lacked jurisdiction to grant tax…